Skip to main content

Happy Endings Are Only For Fairytales


Maus ends without resolving all tensions that occurred during the novel.  When Vladek calls Art Richieu, there are many questions going through my mind.  Does it mean Art will never replace the void that Richieu left in their lives? Or maybe has Vladek finally accepted Art as a son that Richieu once was?

Art Spiegelman also ends Maus with Vladek and Anja’s tombstones dividing the last two panels.  He finishes his story with “happily ever after.”  We all know that the couple doesn’t have a happily ever after because Anja commits suicide in 1968.  Spiegelman could have possibly used the words “happily ever after” because the reality is that there isn’t a happy ending.  Not only was their reunion not a fair representation, but it is insensitive to those who lost their families and had nothing to go back to.  It shows that a story about the Holocaust cannot have a happy ending.  It is something so horrific and atrocious that there is no way that a happy ending could ever be possible. 

The Frank Family
Just like the Spiegelman’s, Anne Frank and her family had to go into hiding on account of Hitler’s invasion of Poland and the Netherlands.  The Franks were in hiding for two years until a German officer found their “Secret Annex,” and were betrayed by an anonymous tip, just like in Maus.  This proves how during the Holocaust it really was one man for himself, and how many friends and family members betrayed one another. Anne’s father, Otto, was the only family member to survive.  In so many cases, not one member of a family survived, so the use of Spiegelman’s reunion between Vladek and Anja is like that of a fairytale.  













            

Comments

  1. Shreya PawarOctober 13, 2019 at 11:00 AM

    I like how you compared the ending of Maus to a fairytale. This is accurate because this what all Holocaust families ideally wanted, but many of them weren’t as lucky as Anja and Vladek. I also agree that even though Vladek narrates their reunion as “happily ever after”, they are still haunted by war images that diminish their individual happiness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sawyer DarishOctober 13, 2019 at 11:50 AM

    I really liked how you were able to relate this back to Anne Frank is an original thought of way. Also I really liked how you found details that were not noticeable the first time you read the page and how you analyzed them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

He Peed On Me

“After you peed on me, I wanted to kill you” (Morrison 213).   At the end of chapter 9, Lena is talking to Milkman about how he has peed all over his family.   Now, Milkman is quite drunk, so he does not truly understand what Lena is getting at, but she tells him the story of when she took him to the woods, and he peed on her.   Lena explains to Milkman that he was born with all his needs catered at his every whim and that he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.   Their entire life, their worlds revolved around Milkman’s.   Lena states that, “As surely as my name is Magdalene, you are the line I will step across” (Morrison 214).   She means that she is finally standing her ground and is physically and mentally exhausted of carrying this weight on her back.   For everything that his mother and sisters have done for him he has peed on them in return.   “When you slept, we were quiet; when you were hungry, we cooked…” (Morrison 215).   ...
4 comments
Read more